Posted by Miss Yihong Ding |
|
Filed under : Kioskea - Tribune >> Mail >> Email >> The future of Email Key words : gmail,web,super-email,twine,The future of Email7 Aug, 2008 10:53 am | |
If there is a service that is used the most frequently by most of the Web users, it must be email. The invention of email is often thought to be the killer application of Internet. Without email, the adoption of Internet might have been delayed for several years.
![]() |
First of all, we should not try to construct some super-email service that integrates all kinds of new service functions from IM to social networking. It would be a monster too heavy for users to drive, as Alex Iskold pointed out in his post. Here are a few features I believe a new-generation email should be equipped. Email does not have to replace the other services. But email does need to improve itself.
Twine builds a very useful feature in its email service---users may edit its already-sent email. At least to me, this is a great feature. I am not sure how many of you have the experience that you want to revise an email just sent out. I often have. I believe that the feeling is especially regular among writers whose mother tongue is not English.
Moreover, many time I feel that I may only catch certain error after it is officially sent. This feeling might be based on some psychological reasons. But anyway, sending out an email containing improper verses or uncaught typos is not only embarrassing but some time also deadly if the email is important such as a job application.
Therefore, an upgraded email service should allow the senders to be able to revise and update their sent messages, especially before the mail being opened by the receivers. Twine is ahead on this service. But there are certainly other ways to solve the problem besides Twine's solution. For instance, we may simply allow users to send a new message to "replace" an old sent message. If the sent message has not been opened yet, the server can simply "replace" the old one by the new message; or otherwise, the sender may notice the server either deliver the "replacing" message as a normal new message or omit it totally.
I would suggest such a feature called "replace" be a new basic email function side-by-side with send and obtain emails. Gmail allows users to label received emails. But why not encourage email senders to tag their messages at the first place? The title of email could not say much. With sender-generated tags, however, it greatly helps receivers filter their messages. And it also helps catch spammers when they abuse tags.
A problem of combining video with email is that video files are often too big for emails to carry. But why videos must be sent. With the tagging function I just mentioned, regular email services may open a separate video email channel that allows people to record and listen to video emails. The regular email can simply be used to exchange the entry-point of the message in the channel with tags so that receivers may know what the shared channel is about.
There are actually more thoughts. One certain thing is, however, that we do expect a new-generation email as many other analysts have mentioned (see the referenced resources).
Referenced resources:
- Wikipedia: Email
- Is email in danger? (Read/WriteWeb)
- I freed myself from E-Mail’s grip, (The New York Times)
- Email to fizzle out in five years? (Internet Evolution)
- Email is the enemy (ZDNet)
- How Gmail blocks spam (Google Operating System)
Originally published on: Thinking Space


Enlarge text
Reduce text size


